Shingled Solar Cells Explained: How Overlapping Strips Boost Panel Output
Shingled solar cells are narrow cell strips overlapped like roof shingles and bonded with electrically conductive adhesive, eliminating busbars and cell gaps to increase active area by 3-5%. This design produces 2-3% more power per square meter than conventional cell interconnection, improves shade tolerance through parallel sub-string architecture, and reduces resistive losses. Used by SunPower/Maxeon and Solaria among others, shingled cells represent a premium approach to maximizing module power density.
How shingled cells are made
The shingled cell manufacturing process starts with a standard full-size solar cell (typically 182mm or 210mm). A laser scribes the cell into 5-6 narrow strips, each roughly 30-40mm wide. The strips are then arranged so that the front edge of one strip overlaps the rear edge of the adjacent strip by about 1-2mm, much like how roof shingles overlap.
The overlapping edges are bonded with an electrically conductive adhesive (ECA), a specialized polymer loaded with silver or copper particles. The ECA simultaneously creates the electrical connection between the positive contact of one strip and the negative contact of the next, and mechanically holds the strips together. No ribbon busbars or soldering are needed.
These bonded strip assemblies are then arranged into strings and wired into the module. Because the strips are narrower and carry less current individually, they can be wired into parallel sub-string configurations that offer better shade tolerance than the purely series-connected strings in conventional modules.
Why removing busbars matters
In a conventional solar cell, busbars are metal fingers printed on the front surface that collect current and route it to ribbon interconnects. These busbars create two types of losses.
Shading loss: The busbars physically block sunlight from reaching the silicon underneath. A typical 5-busbar cell loses about 2-3% of its surface area to busbar shading. Even multi-busbar designs (9-12 busbars) with thinner fingers still shade 1-2% of the cell area.
Resistive loss: Current must travel along the busbar to reach the ribbon interconnect at the cell edge. The longer this path, the more energy is lost to resistive heating. Multi-busbar designs reduce this by providing more collection points, but the fundamental resistive loss remains.
Shingled cells eliminate both losses. There are no busbars on the front surface — the overlap region serves as the interconnect, and it is hidden under the adjacent strip rather than blocking sunlight. The current path is also shorter because each narrow strip collects current over a much smaller area.
| Feature | Conventional (5-busbar) | Multi-busbar (9-12BB) | Shingled |
|---|---|---|---|
| Busbar shading loss | ~2.5% | ~1.5% | 0% |
| Cell gap area loss | ~2-3% | ~2-3% | 0% (overlapped) |
| Total inactive area | ~5% | ~4% | ~1% (edge only) |
| Relative power gain | Baseline | +1-2% | +2-3% |
Shade tolerance: the parallel advantage
Shade performance is where shingled cells offer their most noticeable real-world benefit. In a conventional module, cells are wired in series within each string. When one cell is partially shaded, its current drops, and because all cells in the string must carry the same current, the entire string's output drops to match the weakest cell. Bypass diodes limit the damage by bypassing groups of cells, but they operate in coarse groups (typically one diode per 20-24 cells).
Shingled modules can be wired so that strips form parallel sub-strings across the width of the module. When a shadow (from a vent pipe, chimney, or tree branch) covers one strip, only that sub-string's contribution is lost. The other parallel sub-strings continue operating at full power. The result is a more proportional relationship between shaded area and power loss.
For a rooftop with partial shading from nearby obstructions, this can translate to 5-10% higher annual energy production compared to a conventional module, depending on the shading pattern. For unshaded rooftops, the benefit is limited to the 2-3% power density gain.
Shingled cells vs other interconnection technologies
The solar industry has developed several approaches to reducing interconnection losses. Understanding where shingled fits helps put it in context.
Half-cut cells cut standard cells in half (two pieces instead of five or six), reducing current per cell by 50% and cutting resistive losses by 75%. Half-cut is now the industry standard, used in the vast majority of modern panels.
Multi-busbar (MBB) increases the number of busbars from 5 to 9-16, using thinner round wire instead of flat ribbon. This reduces both shading and resistive losses compared to 5-busbar designs. MBB is widely adopted and often combined with half-cut.
Shingled goes further by eliminating busbars entirely, but at higher manufacturing complexity and cost. The ECA bonding process requires precise temperature and pressure control, and the adhesive material itself adds cost.
In practice, most mainstream panels in 2025-2026 use half-cut cells with multi-busbar interconnection, which captures most of the available efficiency gains at low manufacturing cost. Shingled cells are a premium option for applications where maximum power density and shade tolerance justify the additional expense.
Related terms
- Half-Cut Cells
- Module Efficiency
- Cell Efficiency
- Fill Factor
- Bypass Diode
- Passivated Emitter And Rear Cell
Keep reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What are shingled solar cells?
How much more efficient are shingled cell panels compared to standard panels?
Why are shingled cells more shade tolerant?
Which manufacturers make shingled cell solar panels?
What is the difference between shingled cells and half-cut cells?
Do shingled cells have reliability concerns?
Are shingled cell panels worth the premium?
Sources
- Fraunhofer ISE — Photovoltaics Report 2024 (shingled cell technology overview and efficiency data)
- ITRPV — International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic 2024 (cell interconnection technology trends)
- NREL — Shingled Cell Module Design Study (performance comparison with conventional interconnection)
- Maxeon Solar Technologies — Maxeon IBC and Shingled Cell Technology (Performance Series product details)
- PVEducation — Series and Parallel Connection of Cells (cell interconnection fundamentals)
- Solaria Corporation — PowerXT Shingled Module Technology (shingled module design and field data)
- IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics — Shingled Cell Interconnection: A Review (conductive adhesive bonding and reliability)